Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

639 So. 2d 1135

Valdez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-07-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1995

2 state decisions

Relies on Arjomand v. Ross · Gedeon v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-07-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

¶1We affirm Abelardo Valdez’s convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft; however, we amend the second restitution order dated November 30, 1993, to reflect that Valdez is to pay restitution in the amount of $709.60 to Arvel Burns as reflected in the trial court’s oral pronouncement and its prior restitution order dated October 26,1993; and we reverse the imposition of $7.50 as “local court costs” contained in the trial court’s October 25, 1993, order, and remand in order for the trial court either to reference the statutory authority for the imposition of the costs or to delete such costs. See Gedeon v. State, 636 So.2d 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Thomas v. State, 633 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
/639/so2d/1135 · .json · Public domain