Ex Parte Harwell’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2012
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Keene Corp. v. United States · 425 So. 2d 500 - Gwin v. State · Warren v. State · 475 So. 2d 609 - Ex Parte Bell · 425 So. 2d 510 - Ex Parte Gwin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]o be entitled to a reversal of a judgment for an abuse of discretion, the party claiming abuse must establish that it was prejudiced by the alleged abuse.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““(c) Documents and Tangible Objects. Upon written request of the defendant, the prosecutor shall, within fourteen (14) days after the request has been filed in court as required by Rule 16.4(c), or within such shorter or longer period as may be ordered by the court, on motion, for good cause shown, permit the defendant to analyze, inspect, and copy or photograph books, papers, documents, photographs, tangible objects, controlled substances, buildings or places, or portions of any of these things, which are within the possession, custody, or control of the state/municipality and: “(1) Which are material to the preparation of defendant’s defense; provided, however, that the defendant shall not be permitted to discover or to inspect reports, memoranda, -witness lists, or other internal state/municipality documents made by the prosecutor or the prosecutor’s agents, or by law enforcement agents in connection with the investigation or prosecution of the case, or statements made by state/municipality witnesses; “(e) Information Not Discoverable. ... [T]he discovery or inspection of reports, memoranda, witness lists, or other internal state/municipality documents made by the prosecutor or the prosecutor’s agents, or by law enforcement agents, in connection with the investigation or prosecution of the case, or of statements made by state/municipaMy witnesses or prospective state/municipality witnesses, is not authorized.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`The purpose of allowing an accused to obtain an additional test is to provide him a means of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.