RW v. Soud’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2011
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 604 So. 2d 813 - AA v. Rolle · 610 So. 2d 428 - Dugger v. Grant · 618 So. 2d 268 - HL v. Woolsey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall be based on a risk assessment of the child.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If a child is on release status and not detained pursuant to this section [i.e., section 39.044], the child may be placed into secure, nonsecure, or home detention care only pursuant to a court hearing in which the original risk assessment instrument, rescored based on newly discovered evidence or changed circumstances with the results recommending detention, is introduced into evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(a) Presents a substantial risk of not appearing at a subsequent hearing; (b) Presents a substantial risk of inflicting bodily harm on others as evidenced by recent behavior; (c) Presents a history of committing a serious property offense prior to adjudication, disposition, or placement; (d) Requests protection from imminent bodily harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. D.F.M. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.