639 So. 2d 258 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2010
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 618 So. 2d 825 - Gauthier v. O'BRIEN · Morris v. PEOPLE'S BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF NATCHITOCHES · Legros v. Norcen Exploration, Inc. · 387 So. 2d 674 - McGuire v. Honeycutt · 521 So. 2d 399 - Ducote v. Albert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n a true dual capacity case, an employer or co-employee must wear two hats simultaneously....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * * * * We do not believe the legislature intended the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Compensation Law to relieve employers from tort liability for negligence unrelated to the employment relationship. Wright v. State, 93-3095, p. 4-5 (La.7/5/94), 639 So.2d 258, 260-261 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“whether a hospital and its doctors [were] liable in tort for malpractice when the patient [was] an employee of the hospital but [was] not being treated pursuant to any requirement or benefit of employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.