Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 So. 2d 385 - State v. Wilcoxon

639 So. 2d 385 - State v. Wilcoxon’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2011

16 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square · State v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “although neither specific nor general intent is present, there is such disregard of the interest of others that the offender's conduct amounts to a gross deviation of the standard of care expected to be maintained by a reasonably careful man under like circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Unlike general or specific criminal intent, criminal negligence is essentially negative. Rather than requiring that the accused intend some consequence of his actions, criminal negligence is found from the accused's gross disregard for the consequences of his actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.