639 So. 2d 543 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 district · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Deboue v. Louisiana · Laughlin v. Internal Revenue Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did not bring any of the [appellant's] records with [her] to the district attorney's office, [she] did not discuss the [appellant's] case with anyone at the district attorney's office, [she] did not participate in the prosecution of the [appellant], and [her] representation of the [appellant] occurred before [her] employment at the district attorney's office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““[Defense counsel] did not breach the attorney-client relationship because he abstained from any participation in the prosecution of the appellant and he revealed no confidential information regarding his former client to anyone at the district attorney’s office.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]n order for an indigent defendant to be entitled to funds with which to hire an expert, the defendant must demonstrate a need for the funds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DB v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.