Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 So. 2d 6 - Morgan v. State

639 So. 2d 6 - Morgan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2015

24 state decisions

120199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Ake v. Oklahoma · Minnick v. Mississippi · 574 So. 2d 1059 - Nibert v. State · 536 So. 2d 202 - Tingle v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although not raised by the defendant, the Court feels compelled to include another statutory factor for discussion. That being that the capital felony was committed while the defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance. This is under Florida Statute 921.141(7)(b) [sic]. The two mental health experts established clearly that the defendant suffers from mental illness. Their diagnoses of the defendant were classic paranoid disorders which may have been affecting the defendant at the time of the killings. While it has been shown that the defendant suffers from this chronic mental illness it has not been shown that the defendant was under any particular acute distress at the time of the killings. Indeed, both experts testified that the defendant was capable of planning and executing the crimes as well as his attempts at covering up his misdeeds afterward. They both believed that the defendant could at all times distinguish between right and wrong. Nonetheless, the Court gave this some weight.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.