Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

639 So. 2d 676

Woods v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-07-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1998

1 state decisions

Relies on Edler v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-07-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In sentencing this juvenile as an adult, the trial court wrote a factual finding as to the sophistication and maturity of the defendant that stated as follows: “The sophistication and maturity of the child.” The state concedes that under Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993), the factual finding was insufficient to comply with section 39.-059(7)(c)4, Florida Statutes (1991). We reverse the sentence and remand for resen-tencing in compliance with section 39.-059(7) (c) as explained in Troutman.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
/639/so2d/676 · .json · Public domain