639 So. 2d 72 - Hunter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2019
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 477 So. 2d 544 - Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering · Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re: Sentencing Guidelines · State v. Wenger · 634 So. 2d 613 - Doe v. State · 536 So. 2d 272 - Wyche v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not rule that a finding of relevancy is equivalent to a finding of probable cause. We do not suggest, nor is there a need for, a new rule to determine relevancy. Relevancy and relevant evidence have been determined by Florida courts to be `evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[T]he [S]tate must present evidence and argument to show the nexus between the medical records sought and a pending criminal investigation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(4) Patient records are confidential and must not be disclosed without the con sent of the person to whom they pertain, but appropriate disclosure may be made without such consent to: (d) In any civil or criminal action, unless otherwise prohibited by law, upon the issuance of a subpoena from a court of competent jurisdiction and proper notice by the party seeking such records to the patient or his or her legal representative.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.