Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 SW2D 27 - Chew v. State

Chew v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 204th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Cumbie v. State · Day v. State · Simpkins v. State · DeRusse v. State · Plunkett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An offense is a lesser included offense if: (1) it is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; (2) it differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk of injury to the same person, property, or public interest suffices to establish its commission; (3) it differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less culpable mental state suffices to establish its commission; or (4) it consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or an otherwise included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.