Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 SW2D 401 - Medley v. State

Medley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Seales v. State · Sours v. State · State v. Cleveland · State v. Toney · State v. Medley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judicial substitution in Davis took place prior to rulings on: (1) a motion to suppress identification; (2) a motion for judgment of acquittal; (3) a determination of the instructions to be read; and (4) final argument. In the present case Judge Palumbo performed only a ministerial duty of receiving the verdict. In view of the fact that the movant has failed to allege why the substitution was prejudicial, we find movant’s final contention to be without merit. Medley at 404 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A matter decided on direct appeal cannot be subjected to another review by a subsequent post-conviction relief proceeding, even though the litigant has a different theory to suggest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.