Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 SW2D 569 - State v. Miner

State v. Miner’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2017

6 state decisions

301982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Florida · Wardius v. Oregon · Baldwin v. New York Williams · State v. Royal · State v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The theory of alibi is that the fact of defendant’s presence elsewhere is essentially inconsistent with his presence at the place where the offense was committed; therefore, he could not have personally participated. Kathy Stricklen’s testimony did not operate logically to negate defendant’s presence at the time and place of the offense ... Therefore, Bonnie Coad’s testimony did not rebut an actual alibi defense, as there was none, but she merely refuted defendant’s evidence and corroborated the state’s case-in-ehief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.