Goodwill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4001 · 18 U.S.C. § 4083 · 18 U.S.C. § 471 (Counterfeit Deterrence Act of 1992)
Relies on Ex Parte Blume · 154 Tex. Crim. 112 - Ex Parte Spears · Prince v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the same defendant has been convicted in two or more cases, and the punishment assessed in each case is confinement in an institution operated by the Department of Corrections or the jail for a term of imprisonment, judgment and sentence shall be pronounced in each case in the same manner as if there had been but one conviction, except that in the discretion of the court, the judgment in the second and subsequent convictions may either be that the punishment shall begin when the judgment and sentence in the preceding conviction has ceased to operate, or that the punishment shall run concurrently with the other case or cases, and sentence and execution shall be accordingly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hernandez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.