Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 639 SW2D 854 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2011

11 state decisions

801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · State v. Petrechko · State v. Lee · State v. Strubberg · State v. Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) When two or more defendants are jointly charged under the provisions of one or more of Sections 566.030 or 566.- 060, RSMo., they shall be tried jointly or separately as the court in its discretion may order, unless there is evidence admissible against one or more defendants and not admissible against one or more other defendants, in which event, upon motion made prior to the commencement of trial by a defendant against whom the evidence is in admissible, the defendant or defendants against whom the evidence is inadmissible shall be tried separately.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.