¶1Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 22, 1978, affirmed for the reasons stated by Hughes, J. Plaintiff-respondent shall recover of appellants $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Fein, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.; Kupferman, J. P. and Birns, J. dissent in the following memorandum by Kupferman, J. P.: I dissent and would reverse and grant the motion. My determination assumes, of course, the good faith of the third-party defendants-respondents. However, I do not believe that a partner in a law firm may, after leaving the firm, accept as a client one who previously was represented by the law firm and now, among other things, brings suit against them. (Cardinale v Golinello, 43 NY2d 288; Rotante v Lawrence Hosp., 46 AD2d 199; Consolidated Theatres v Warner Bros. Circuit Mgt. Corp., 216 F2d 920; cf. Cinema 5 v Cinerama, Inc., 528 F2d 1384; see, also, The Unfortunate Lawyer—Counsel on the Ropes in the Second Circuit, Bronx Bar Advocate, vol 22, No. 3, May-June 1975, p 71.)
64 A.D.2d 558
Greene v. Greene
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 1978
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1978-07-13
Decided 1978-07-13