In Re Klein’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably Jones v. Hill (1987), Bank of India v. Sapru (In Re Sapru) (1991)
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 727
Relies on In Re Figueroa · Francis v. Riso (In Re Riso) · Bradco Supply Corp. v. Lane (In Re Lane) · Marathon Restaurant Corp. v. Three Bros. Development & Construction Co. (In Re Barr) · Middlesex Insurance Co. v. Koritz (In Re Koritz)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is clear that by prohibiting that which it formerly permitted, Congress intended to no longer subject the preeminent fresh start policy to the uncertainties of excusable neglect in failing to timely object to discharge of a claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Enlargement Limited. The court may enlarge the time for taking action under Rules ... 4007(c) ..., only to the extent and under the conditions stated in those rules.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.