Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 CAL 369 - People v. Murback

People v. Murback’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
July 1977
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 1977 · most notably People v. Goldenson (1888), People v. Rogers (1912)

18 state decisions

501883189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Sprague · People v. Turley · Sill v. Reese · Rousset v. Boyle · People v. Colby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if you do find the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree, you have the discretion to determine the nature of his punishment; and if in your sound judgment and discretion there is any fact or circumstance in the case which ought to mitigate the extreme penalty of death, you will by your verdict indicate the same; but if you find no such mitigation in the facts of the case, and think the death penalty should be inflicted you will simply find him guilty of murder in the first degree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.