Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 CAL 525 - Ex parte Sontag

Ex parte Sontag’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
5
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2009

15 state decisions

801884189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Baker · Low's case · People v. Wyman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No case has been called to our attention in which it has been held that a grand juror could be compelled to answer how he voted with respect to the finding of a particular indictment. [¶] In this State the whole matter is regulated by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “for the purposes of public justice, or for the protection of private rights....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.