People v. Treloar’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
92 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently October 1993 · most notably 2 Cal. 3d 362 - People v. Terry (1970), 65 Cal. 2d 681 - People v. Rollins (1967)
92 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · Fay v. Noia · Linkletter v. Walker · 62 Cal. 2d 338 - People v. Dorado · 60 Cal. 2d 631 - People v. Morse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold, therefore, that where, as here, the investigation is no longer a general inquiry into an unsolved crime but has begun to focus on a particular suspect, the suspect has been taken into police custody, the police carry out a process of interrogations that lands itself to eliciting incriminating statements, the suspect has requested and been denied an opportunity to consult with his lawyer, and the police have not effectively warned him of his absolute constitutional right to remain silent, the accused has been denied `the Assistance of Counsel' * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Myers“the questioning was initiated by defendant, ... the [defendant's] statement was volunteered in response to a neutral inquiry invited by defendant's own remarks; [and] the conduct of the police was neither intimidating nor accusatory, nor did it appear in any way designed to elicit incriminating statements....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Charles“inquisitorial techniques in seeking to prove the charge against the accused out of his own mouth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Charles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.