Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Cal. 2d 778 - See v. See

64 Cal. 2d 778 - See v. See’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

260
cited by 260 later decisions
6
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

233 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 260 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 13 Cal. 3d 349 - Smith v. Lewis (1975), 14 Cal. 3d 604 - In Re Marriage of Mix (1975)

233 state decisions

1050196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 39 Cal. 2d 858 - De Burgh v. De Burgh · Siberell v. Siberell · 34 Cal. 2d 515 - Sapp v. Barenfeld · Estate of Neilson · 122 Cal. App. 2d 116 - Thomasset v. Thomasset

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 260 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “commingles, he assumes the burden of keeping records adequate to establish the balance of community income and expenditures at the time an asset is acquired with commingled property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Property acquired by purchase during a marriage is presumed to be community property, and the burden is on the spouse asserting its separate character to overcome the presumption.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The character of property as separate or community is determined at the time of its acquisition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.