In Re Klor’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
3 district · 67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2017 · most notably 1 Cal. 3d 767 - In Re Bushman (1970), 17 Cal. 3d 575 - California Housing Finance Agency v. Elliott (1976)
3 district · 67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Robinson v. State of California · 19 Cal. 2d 488 - In Re Bell · 64 Cal. 2d 70 - In re Carlson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Petitioners in the present case have failed to sustain the burden of proving that they were not tried and convicted for acts of violence since the transcripts of testimony at their trials reveal evidence of such acts. ... Because petitioners have failed to sustain the burden of proving that they were not convicted of the one valid provision of the ordinance prohibiting acts of violence, the writ heretofore issued is discharged and the petitioners are remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Yuba County.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“So strong was the evidence tending to establish petitioner's guilt under the erroneous portion of the charge and so weak the evidence which would ground a conviction under the valid portion that we determine that petitioner can discharge his `burden of proving that he was not ... convicted for violating the valid part....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the burden of proving that their convictions were based not upon the constitutional but upon the unconstitutional provisions of the ordinance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.