64 Cal. 2d 838 - In Re Alkow’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently January 2006 · most notably 6 Cal. 3d 562 - In Re Higbie (1972), 65 Cal. 2d 447 - Hallinan v. Committee of Bar Examiners (1966)
4 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 12 Cal. 2d 93 - In Re Craig · Werner v. State Bar · 10 Cal. 2d 147 - In Re Hatch · 59 Cal. 2d 765 - Hyland v. State Bar · Grove v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`everything done contrary to justice, honesty, modesty, or good morals' ( In re McAllister, 14 Cal.2d 602, 603 [ 95 P.2d 932 ]; In re Hatch, 10 Cal.2d 147, 150 [ 73 P.2d 885 ]) and as `[a]n act of baseness, vileness or depravity in the private and social duties which a man owes to his fellow men or to society in general, contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between man and man' ( In re Boyd, 48 Cal.2d 69, 70 [ 307 P.2d 625 ]; In re Craig, 12 Cal.2d 93, 97 [ 82 P.2d 442 ]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.