Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 1949
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rehfuss v. Rehfuss · 92 Cal. App. 212 - Hammond v. Hammond
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But in divorce actions courts look with special favor upon applications for hearings on the merits. In a divorce action if an application for relief be made in due time the court is justified in setting aside a default ‘upon very slight showing’. Hammond v. Hammond, 92 Cal. App. 212 , 267 P. 893, 894 ; Rehfuss v. Rehfuss, 169 Cal. 86 , 145 P. 1020 . This rule is based upon the ground that the state is interested in preserving the integrity of the family relation, which cannot be destroyed merely by the consent of the parties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Puterman v. Puterman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.