In Re Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1988
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 16 Cal. 2d 701 - In Re Connor · In re Estate of Eichhoff · People v. Hayes · 15 Cal. App. 2d 443 - In Re Mirando
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the complete record of petitioner's prior convictions in the State of North Carolina was before the trial court, and that the court in adjudging him to be an habitual criminal did so with due regard to the provisions of section 644 of the Penal Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re McVickers“In order to adjudge a defendant an habitual criminal the test is not whether he shall have been twice convicted of any felonies, but whether he shall have been twice convicted of felonies enumerated in section 644 of the Penal Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Seeley“If nothing further was disclosed by the record before us we would feel compelled to grant the writ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re McVickers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.