Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 CALAPP2D 55 - Muir v. Cheney Bros.

Muir v. Cheney Bros.’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
April 1979
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1979

19 state decisions

601944195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co. · Jordan v. Guerra · 36 Cal. App. 2d 700 - Casselman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · 42 Cal. App. 2d 195 - Burke v. John E. Marshall, Inc. · 52 Cal. App. 2d 255 - Bennett v. Chandler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “admissible as a part of the res gestae for the purpose of giving to the jury full knowledge of all the facts and circumstances which existed at the time and place of the accident, which were known to the parties, so as to permit the jury to pass upon the question of whether plaintiff conducted himself as an ordinary and reasonable person would have conducted himself in the light of all of the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.