Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 CONNAPP 160 - Hamernick v. Bach

Hamernick v. Bach’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ardoline v. Keegan · Marchetti v. Ramirez · In Re Appeal of Dattilo · Freedman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad · Munson v. Atwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court [also] has the inherent power to set aside a verdict where it finds it has made, in its instructions, rulings on evidence, or otherwise in the course of the trial, a palpable error which was harmful to the proper disposition of the case and probably brought about a different result in the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.