Martin v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2021
2 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Barde v. Board of Trustees · Shay v. Rossi · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc. · Amore v. Frankel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his argument confuses sovereign immunity with statutory immunity. If the defendants have established their defenses of sovereign immunity, they need not demonstrate their compliance with § 4-165 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“there was nothing egregious about the remainder of the alleged misconduct that was asserted in the complaint. The plaintiff has not challenged the validity of the ... “arrest warrant.” ... Apart from the legality of the entry the plaintiff complains of having been pushed to the ground ... and of having windows and doors smashed.... We are not persuaded that these allegations, if true, rise to the level of egregious misconduct. They are far removed from the allegations of misconduct that underlay Binette .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The fact that the plaintiff has framed his complaint so as to seek relief from the defendants in their individual capacities does not preclude their rights to invoke the doctrine of sovereign immunity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.