Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 CONNAPP 55 - In re Jeffrey C.

In re Jeffrey C.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
3
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Putman v. Kennedy (2006), 71 Conn. App. 771 - Berglass v. Berglass (2002)

39 state decisions

290200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on DeBeradinis v. Zoning Commission · Loisel v. Rowe · Eldridge v. Eldridge · In re Shyliesh H. · Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to the case at hand and preclude[d] any far reaching impact in future Juvenile Court proceedings”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n adjudication of neglect relates to the status of the child and is not necessarily premised on parental fault. A finding that the child is neglected is different from finding who is responsible for the child's condition of neglect. Although [General Statutes] § 46b-129 requires both parents to be named in the petition, the adjudication of neglect is not a judgment that runs against a person or persons so named in the petition; [i]t is not directed against them as parents, but rather is a finding that the children are neglected. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “specific steps contained in the ex parte order are not themselves orders, but rather serve as criteria by which to measure personal rehabilitation and notice of impending termination of parental rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.