Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 CONNAPP 687 - State v. Mincewicz

State v. Mincewicz’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Yagow v. United States · United States v. Alaska · White v. Illinois · ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It repeatedly has been held that to determine whether two charges arose from the same act or transaction, we look to the information, as amplified by the bill of particulars, if any. State v. Goldson, 178 Conn. 422 , 424, 423 A.2d 114 (1979) ; 7 accord State v. Devino, 195 Conn. 70 , 74, 485 A.2d 1302 (1985) ; State v. Williams, 59 Conn.App. 603 , 606-607, 757 A.2d 1191 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 946 , 762 A.2d 907 (2000) ; State v. Patrick, 42 Conn.App. 640 , 645, 681 A.2d 380 (1996) ; State v. Coleman, 41 Conn.App. 255 , 275, 675 A.2d 887 (1996), rev'd on other grounds, 242 Conn. 523 , 700 A.2d 14 (1997) ; State v. Glover, 40 Conn.App. 387 , 391, 671 A.2d 384 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 918 , 673 A.2d 1145 (1996) ; State v. Smart, [ 37 Conn.App. 360 , 365, 656 A.2d 677 , cert. denied, 233 Conn. 914 , 659 A.2d 187 (1995) ]; State v. Roy, 34 Conn.App. 751 , 768, 643 A.2d 289 (1994), rev'd on other grounds, 233 Conn. 211 , 658 A.2d 566 (1995) ; State v. Nita, 27 Conn.App. 103 , 113, 604 A.2d 1322 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 903 , 606 A.2d 1329 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 844 , 113 S.Ct. 133 , 121 L.Ed.2d 86 (1992) ; State v. Marsala, 1 Conn.App. 647 , 650, 474 A.2d 488 (1984).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.