Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 CONNAPP 781 - Aubin v. Miller

Aubin v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Label Systems Corp. v. Samad Aghamohammadi (2004), Maloney v. PCRE, LLC (2002)

49 state decisions

370200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp. · Emigrant Savings Bank v. Cam · Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. · Gateway Co. v. DiNoia · Discover Leasing, Inc. v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “interest may be recovered and allowed in civil action as damages for the retention of money after it becomes payable. It is clear that Connecticut case law establishes that prejudgment interest is to be awarded if in the discretion of the trier of fact equitable considerations deemed that it is warranted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A court will not torture words to import ambiguity where the ordinary meaning leaves no room for ambiguity . . . Similarly, any ambiguity in a contract must emanate from the language used in the contract rather than from one party's subjective perception of the terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Conversion is an unauthorized assumption and exercise of the right of ownership over goods belonging to another, to the exclusion of the owner's rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.