Braddock Glass Co. v. Macbeth’s Empirical Analysis
64 F. 118 · 1894
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1931
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Root v. Railway Co. · Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. Adams · Duer v. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co. · Busell Trimmer Co. v. Stevens · Consolidated Roller Mill Co. v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has been made plainly obvious to us, and seems to be fully recognized by the trade, that the appearance of the patented design is very different from that of any .other which had previously existed; and, this being so, the method of its production is irrelevant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Stirling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.