Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.1d 80 - Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Barnes

Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis

64 F. 80 · 1894

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
July 1950
most recently cited

18 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1950

18 federal appellate ·

801894190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Dunmeyer · Jeremian Van Rensselaer v. Philip Kearney · Noonan v. Lee · Sawyer v. Prickett · Peters v. Bowman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Such an action requires for its foundation a false statement knowingly made, or a false statement made' in ignorance of, and in reckless disregard of, its truth and falsity, and of the consequences such a statement may entail. The evil intent — the intent to deceive — is the basis of the action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.