Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.2d 1 - Foley v. United States

Foley v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.2d 1 · 1933

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 1997 · most notably In re Fried (1947), Hunsucker v. Phinney (1974)

25 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1001933194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 612

Relies on Olmstead v. United States · Marron v. United States · Burdeau v. McDowell · Gouled v. United States · United States v. Lefkowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'reach forward to control the improper preparation of evidence which is to be used in the case coming before it, and . . . by summary procedure (to) restrain oppressive or unlawful conduct of its own officers.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * by summary procedure restrain oppressive or unlawful conduct of its own officers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.