Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.2d 163 - Fletcher v. Laws

Fletcher v. Laws’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.2d 163 · 1933

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
April 2017
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Booth v. Fletcher (1938), In re Fletcher (1939)

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

150193319401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The sole question at present is whether the facts found by the lower court sufficiently sustain the charge of misconduct against the appellant. We have no hesitation in saying that the facts fully sustain the charge. The appellant willfully practiced a fraud upon his client * * * ' in the course of his professional employment, whereby he sought to gain, and succeeded in gaining, a pecuniary advantage for himself at the expense of either or both of these parties. His conduct deserves condemnation both in morals and law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.