Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.2d 201 - Smith v. Lampe

Smith v. Lampe’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.2d 201 · 1933

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably Watz v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. (1970), Chapman v. City of Grosse Pointe Farms (1967)

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

7019331940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. · Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railway Company v. Kellogg · The Plymouth · Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. · Hill v. Winsor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the negligent act originates on land and the damage occurs on water, the cause of action is within the admiralty jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.