Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.2d 210 - Hale v. Hummel

Hale v. Hummel’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.2d 210 · 1933

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 1984
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1984

10193319401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Snyder v. Free · Clark v. Thias · Coleman v. Hagey · Wall v. Beedy · Leavitt v. LaForce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There appears to be no hard and last rule as to just what elements are necessary to make out a prima facie case, but if the conveyance is shown to be voluntary, the burden rests upon the party accepting the same to establish circumstances which repel the presumption of a fraudulent intent. [Citations.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.