Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.2d 27 - United States v. Busch

United States v. Busch’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.2d 27 · 1933

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
July 2005
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2005

15 federal appellate ·

4019331940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Morgan v. Devine · Dunbar v. United States · Parmagini v. United States · Myers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence sustaining the first count would not have proved the second, and vice versa; ... when the drugs are different, evidence sustaining one count can surely not be regarded as sustaining the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.