Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 1010 - Oscar Larson Company v. United Capitol Insurance Company

Oscar Larson Company v. United Capitol Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 1010 · 1995

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2016

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

80199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Department of Revenue of Montana v. Ranch · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Detroit · Brooks v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. · Stockdale v. Jamison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] contract of insurance will be construed strictly against the insurer and liberally in favor of the insured. Ambiguous provisions of an insurance policy will be construed most strongly against the insurer and in favor of the insured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n a sequence separated by commas, a modifier runs to the end of the phrase, or until the next comma.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.