Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
64 F.3d 1250 · 1994
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably 21 Cal. 4th 585 - Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union v. Davis (1999), Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Federal Aviation Administration (1998)
22 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 18 U.S.C. § 1166 (§ 23 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2702 (§ 3 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2710 (§ 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians · United States v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a state need only allow Indian tribes to operate games that others can operate, but need not give tribes what others cannot have.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he “such gaming” language of 25 U.S.C. § 2710 (d)(1)(B) does not require the state to negotiate with respect to forms of gaming it does not presently permit. Because video keno and traditional keno are not the same and video keno is the only form of keno allowed under state law, it would be illegal ... for the tribe to offer traditional keno to its patrons.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“class III gaming shall be lawful on Indian lands only if such activities are ... located in a State that permits such gaming for any purpose by any person, organization, or entity....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.