Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 1432 - Harris v. Wood

Harris v. Wood’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 1432 · 1995

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
8
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably State v. Brown (1997), State v. Thiel (2003)

47 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

5401995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Whitten v. United States · Bonin v. Calderon · Sanders v. Ratelle · Cooper v. Fitzharris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not need to decide whether these deficiencies alone meet the prejudice standard because other significant errors occurred that, considered cumulatively, compel affirmance of the district court's grant of habeas corpus as to the sentence of death.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness ... considering all the circumstances ... under prevailing professional norms.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there is a reasonable probability that, absent the errors, the factfinder would have had a reasonable doubt respecting guilt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.