Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 155 - Fairfax County Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. W.M. Schlosser Co.

Fairfax County Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. W.M. Schlosser Co.’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 155 · 1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 7 U.S.C. § 2022

Relies on Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co. · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Horton v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he district court is a court of original jurisdiction, not an appellate tribunal,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To the extent that the federal district court would treat a case removed from the [state court] as a review of an administrative decision by giving deference to the [agency's] determination, ... this would place a federal court in an improper posture vis-a-vis a non-federal agency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the district court is `a court of original jurisdiction,' not `an appellate tribunal,' and thus, is without jurisdiction `to review on appeal action taken administratively or judicially in a state proceeding.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.