Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 251 - Brooks v. United States

Brooks v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 251 · 1995

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
October 2016
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Gonzalez v. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. (1998), Smith v. Ford Motor Co. (2000)

19 federal appellate ·

150199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3731 (False Claims Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987) · 7 U.S.C. § 2021 · 7 U.S.C. § 2023

Relies on Morris v. Slappy · Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co. · Keller v. United States · Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Carbon County Coal Co. · Graff v. City of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) had actual knowledge of the falsity of the information at issue; (2) acted in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of that information; or (3) acted in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When reviewing challenges for abuse of discretion in district court scheduling, matters of trial management are for the district judge and we intervene only when it is apparent the judge acted unreasonably.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.