Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 355 - United States v. O'Conner

United States v. O'Conner’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 355 · 1995

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the fact that other impeachment evidence was available to defense counsel does not render additional impeachment evidence immaterial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.