Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 409 - United States v. Dickson

United States v. Dickson’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 409 · 1995

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2020

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1301995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Brown v. Illinois · Minnesota v. Olson · Mullins Coal Co. v. Director

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the challenged evidence is admissible if the causal connection between the constitutional violation and the discovery of the evidence is so attenuated as to rid the taint. Id. Under the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the challenged evidence is admissible if it came from a lawful source independent of the illegal conduct. Id. Under the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.