United States v. Estacio’s Empirical Analysis
64 F.3d 477 · 1995
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably United States v. Christo (1997), United States v. Lomow (2001)
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Doerr v. Doerr · Lowenfield v. Phelps · United States v. Williams · Murphy v. Sullivan · Sorrell v. Dayton Women's Health Center, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any other indicia of coerciveness or pressure.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Accordingly, there existed separable underlying unlawful activity that gave rise to the proceeds charged in the indictment....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Section [ ] 1956 requires that the government additionally prove that the defendant knowingly used the proceeds of unlawful activity in a separate financial transaction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.