Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 5 - Ramsdell v. Bowles

Ramsdell v. Bowles’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 5 · 1995

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably CMM Cable Rep, Inc. v. Ocean Coast Properties, Inc. (1996), NEPSK, Inc. v. Town of Houlton (2002)

11 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1691 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1691E · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367

Relies on Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. P & B Autobody · Pignons S.A. de Mecanique v. Polaroid Corp. · United States v. Roberts · E.H. Ashley & Co. v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services · Greene v. Union Mutual Life Insurance Co. of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] creditor shall not require the signature of an applicant’s spouse or other person, other than a joint applicant, on any credit instrument if the applicant qualifies under the creditor’s standard of creditworthiness for the amount due and terms of the credit requested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Unless within ten (10) days after the filing of a motion the opposing party files written objection thereto, incorporating a memorandum of law, the opposing party shall be deemed to have waived objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Had the judge ignored disputed material issues of fact as a result of [its application of Local Rule 19, CMM] could have called them to our attention in [its] brief on appeal; but [it] failed to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.