Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 547 - Lenz v. Dewey

Lenz v. Dewey’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 547 · 1995

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
December 2016
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2016

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

90199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Anderson v. Creighton · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Greene v. McElroy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the employee was given some alternative to resignation; (2) whether the employee understood the nature of the choice he was given; (3) whether the employee was given a reasonable time in which to choose; and (4) whether he was permitted to select the effective date of resignation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Once a defendant asserts qualified immunity, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the defendants violated a law that was clearly established.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “or that the official did not act in good faith.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.