Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 580 - Griego v. Padilla

Griego v. Padilla’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 580 · 1995

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 45 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Northington v. Marin (1996), Garcia v. City of Albuquerque (2000)

10 federal appellate · 45 district · 1 state decisions

3601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Brown III v. Felsen · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Heiser v. Woodruff · Ada v. Guam Society of Obstetricians & Gynecologists

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is common practice among district judges in this circuit to make such a statement and adopt the magistrate judges’ recommended dispositions when they find that magistrate judges have dealt with the issues fully and accurately and that they could add little of value to that analysis. We cannot interpret the district court’s statement as establishing that it failed to perform the required de novo review.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “district court to consider relevant evidence of record and not merely review the magistrate judge's recommendation”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[r]edetermination of issues is warranted if there is reason to doubt the quality, extensiveness, or fairness of procedures followed in prior litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.