Edwards v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
64 F.3d 601 · 1995
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2020
5 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Wilson v. Garcia · Lehman v. Nakshian · Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'An agency's interpretation of an ambiguous provision within a statute it is authorized to implement is entitled to judicial deference.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the ADEA and Title VII share a common purpose, the elimination of discrimination in the workplace . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“subject to, or affected by, any provision of this chapter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rossiter v. Potter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.