Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 F.3d 607 - Maloy v. Phillips

Maloy v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

64 F.3d 607 · 1995

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Bartlett v. Heibl (1997), Johnson v. Riddle (2002)

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

100199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692E (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)

Relies on Bates v. C & S Adjusters, Inc. · Mattson v. U.S. West Communications, Inc. · Maahs v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Apparently, every other circuit to have weighed in on the issue has rejected the posi tion adopted by Mattson; indeed, two circuits termed the position later adopted by Mattson 'frivolous.' ” (citations omitted)). In Maloy, which addressed the same statute of limitations at issue in Mattson, we explicitly declined to follow Mattson's holding that Rule 6(a) should not apply to this statute of limitations (though we agreed with other aspects of that ruling). We held: "We find the reasoning of the Eighth Circuit persuasive and adopt the approach used in Mattson, save for the calculation of the days from the mailing of the collection letter. As stated above, in computing the statute of limitations we will exclude the mailing date as the triggering date of the alleged ... violation in accordance with Rule 6(a).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must be brought 'within one year from the date on which the violation occurs '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.